Can You Fire an Employee for Poor Performance in Canada?
Updated: Oct 7
Yes, an employer can terminate an employee for poor performance in Canada. But poor performance does not automatically mean you can terminate them for cause.
That distinction matters.
There is a big difference between deciding that an employee is not meeting the expectations of the role and having enough grounds to terminate their employment without notice or termination pay.
For employers, especially small businesses without an internal HR team, this is where performance issues can become unnecessarily complicated.
Here is what you need to know.
Poor Performance vs. Termination for Cause
An employee does not have to commit serious misconduct before an employer can decide to end the employment relationship.
In many situations, an employer can terminate an employee without cause, provided the termination is not discriminatory, retaliatory or otherwise prohibited and the employee receives the notice or pay they are legally entitled to.
Termination for cause is different.
A for-cause termination generally means the employer is taking the position that the employee's conduct or performance was serious enough to end the employment relationship without the notice or pay that would otherwise be required.
The threshold is high.
Simply saying:
"They're not performing."
"They aren't a good fit."
"We've talked about this before."
"They should know what is expected."
"We're frustrated with them."
doesn't necessarily establish cause.
Can Poor Performance Ever Be Just Cause?
Potentially, but employers should be cautious.
There is a significant difference between an employee who is struggling to meet expectations and an employee who has demonstrated serious or persistent incompetence despite knowing what is required and having a reasonable opportunity to improve.
Where an employer intends to rely on poor performance as cause for termination, questions can include:
Were the performance expectations reasonable?
Were those expectations clearly communicated?
Did the employee understand where they were falling short?
Were specific examples provided?
Was the employee given a reasonable opportunity to improve?
Was appropriate support or training provided?
Was the employee warned about what could happen if performance did not improve?
Did the performance problems continue?
The facts matter.
A single mistake, an employee who is still learning the role, unclear expectations, or general dissatisfaction with someone's performance is very different from a documented pattern of serious performance problems that continues after repeated intervention.
Do You Need a Performance Improvement Plan Before Terminating Someone?
Not necessarily.
There is no universal rule in Canada requiring every employer to put every underperforming employee on a formal Performance Improvement Plan, or PIP, before ending their employment.
Sometimes a formal PIP makes sense. Sometimes it doesn't.
What matters more is whether the employer has appropriately managed the performance issue based on the circumstances.
That might involve regular coaching, clear expectations, written feedback, additional training, documented conversations, written warnings or a formal improvement plan.
A 12-page PIP isn't automatically better than a well-managed series of clear conversations.
The goal should be to make sure the employee understands:
Here's what isn't working.Here's what we need instead.Here's the support we're providing.Here's when we expect to see improvement.Here's what could happen if things don't improve.
Then document it.
One of the Biggest Problems: The Employee Is Surprised
A common problem we see isn't that the employer hasn't noticed poor performance.
They've noticed it for months.
The problem is that nobody has clearly told the employee.
The manager has been frustrated. Leadership has discussed it. Coworkers may know there is a problem. Work may even have been quietly reassigned to other people.
But when you look at what has actually been communicated to the employee, there is very little.
Then the organization wants to terminate for performance.
If the first time an employee hears that their performance is unacceptable is during the termination meeting, that's a warning sign that the performance issue may not have been managed effectively.
Managers do not need to document every minor coaching conversation. But significant or recurring performance concerns should not live exclusively in a manager's head.
What If You've Already Had Multiple Conversations?
This is where the quality of those conversations matters.
"We've talked to them five times" sounds significant.
But what did those conversations actually say?
There is a difference between:
"You need to step it up."
and:
"Your role requires client reports to be submitted by Friday at 3:00 p.m. Three of the last five reports were submitted after the deadline. We need reports submitted on time going forward. We'll review this again in 30 days, and continued failure to meet this expectation may result in further corrective action, up to and including termination."
The second conversation gives the employee something concrete to understand and act on.
Clear expectations make performance easier to manage for everyone involved.
What About a New Employee Who Just Isn't Working Out?
Employers sometimes assume that a probationary period means they can terminate a new employee for any reason without notice or further consideration.
That can be risky.
Probationary periods, minimum termination entitlements and employment contracts interact differently across Canada. Human rights protections and other protected employment rights also continue to apply during probation.
We'll cover probationary terminations separately because they deserve their own discussion.
The important point is this:
"They're on probation" should not be treated as shorthand for "there are no rules."
You Can Decide Someone Isn't the Right Fit Without Proving Cause
This is an important distinction for employers.
Sometimes performance simply isn't where it needs to be.
Maybe the employee doesn't have the skills the organization expected. Maybe the role has evolved. Maybe coaching hasn't produced enough improvement. Or perhaps you've reached the point where continuing the employment relationship no longer makes sense.
That does not necessarily mean you need to build a case for cause.
Employers can often end an employment relationship without cause, provided they meet their legal obligations and the termination isn't for a prohibited reason.
Depending on the employee, employment contract and jurisdiction, those obligations may go beyond the minimum notice or termination pay required under provincial employment standards legislation.
This is one of the reasons employers should be careful about deciding on their own that a poor performer is automatically a "for cause" termination.
Before Terminating for Poor Performance
Before making the decision, step back and look at the full picture.
Ask:
What exactly is the performance problem?
What evidence do we have?
Have expectations been clear?
Has the employee been told they are not meeting them?
What opportunity have they had to improve?
Have we provided reasonable support?
Is there anything else contributing to the issue?
Are there potential disability, accommodation, leave or human rights considerations?
What does the employment agreement say?
Are we considering termination with cause or without cause?
Have we confirmed the employee's termination entitlements?
The more complicated the situation, the more important it is to get advice before acting.
The Bottom Line
Yes, you can terminate an employee for poor performance in Canada.
But poor performance and just cause are not the same thing.
If an employee isn't meeting expectations, deal with the issue early. Be specific about what isn't working. Explain what needs to change. Give reasonable support and opportunity to improve where appropriate. And document important conversations.
If the employment relationship ultimately needs to end, make a deliberate decision about how the termination should be handled rather than assuming that poor performance automatically eliminates the employee's entitlement to notice or pay.
Need Help Managing a Performance Issue?
A&A supports employers with performance management, difficult employee situations and terminations. We can help you assess what's happening, determine the appropriate next steps and make sure the process is practical, fair and well documented.
How healthy is your HR?
Use our free 20-point HR Readiness Checklist to see what's working, identify potential gaps and decide what to prioritize next.
This article provides general information only and is not legal advice. Employment standards and termination requirements vary across Canada, and individual circumstances matter. Employers should obtain legal advice where appropriate, particularly when considering termination for cause.
Selected Sources:
